In 1885, Mahant Raghuvar Das failed a case in the Faizabad Court to renovate the temple near Chabootra area. That case was rejected. But on appeal the British Judge Col. F.E.A. Cowmiyar wrote in his judgment that what happened to the Hindus was extremely sad about the fact that a Masjid was built over one of their most sacred site some 356 years ago and now it is late to rectify that.

During 1934 the domes were at least partially damaged by the Sants of Ayodhya. After this incident the whole area was declared off-limit to the Muslims.

B. Summary of the Legal Findings after India’s Independence

The Revenue Record as recorded in the village of Ramkot (or Kot Ramchandra) shows the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi site area as Janmasthan.

On 23rd December 1949, the idols of Ram Lala Virajman (appeared) in the middle of the floor space under the central dome and soon after thousands of devotes assembled there to worship and the practice of continuous pooja and bhajan started, in front of the idols.

On 29th December, 1949, the city Magistrate exercised control over the whole area. However, the pujaris (i.e. Priests) continued their prayers to Ram Lala.

On 16th January, 1950 one Shri Gopal Simla Visharad filed a suit in the Faizabad civil court for the exclusive rights of performing pooja for Ram Lala and asked the judge to issue orders to stop anyone moving the idols. A temporary injection was issued preventing the removal of the idols of Ram Lala. The civil judge on 3rd March, 1951, and later the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court maintained that order an dismissed the appeal. It is interesting to note that 13 Muslim residents of Ayodhya has filed affidavits in the proceeding under section 145 of Cr. P.C. before the magistrate.

They provided the affidavits to the effect that the disputed structure was constructed after demolishing the temple of Janmabhoomi at that site and that they have no objection if the place remains with the Hindus. The city magistrate closed the file consigned by his order 30, July, 1953, on the ground that there was no longer any apprehension of breach of peace.

On 5th December, 1950, Paramahansa Ramachandradasji also filed a suit asking for the continuation of the pooja and keeping the idols in the Babri structure. During August 1990 out of sheer frustration with the justice system, the Plaintiff Paramhans Ramachandras withdrew the case.

A Muslim filed a suit against the status quo order (i.e., of not allowing the Muslims to enter any of the area and the continuation of pooja and bhajan in front of Ram Lala). On 26th April, 1955 the case was dismissed.

Just as the limitation for the legal procedures, for the public, was about to end, after 11 years, 11 months and 26 days after the day when the idols of Ram Lala idols emerged in 1949, a fourth suit was filed by the Sunni Central Board of Waqf of U.P. to reclaim the Janmabhoomi area for the Muslims.

On 16th December, 1964 the Faizabad civil judge consolidated all the suits. After hearing the parties on all the issues the judge in his 21st April, 1966 order said that "no valid notification so far relating to the specific disputed property of the present suits at hand". This finding has become final. This means the court took out the bottom of the Waqf Board’s right to suit.

In April, 1984, the VHP organized the first Dharma Sansad in New Delhi and Shi Rama Janmabhoomi Mukti Yagya was initiated. In Uttar Pradesh, the Sants started a Rama-Janki Ratha Yatra to create nation-wide awareness and to bring to the notice the earlier 77 encounter to free the Rama Janmasthan.

On 21st January, 1986, Shri Umeshchandra Pandey filed a suit in the Munsif Magistrate of Faizabad and requested the court to order the opening of the locks on the gates of the Janmasthan property. On 1st February, 1986 the District Magistrate Shri K.M. Pandey ordered that the locks be opened and further ordered the government of U.P. not to come in the way of the pooja and bhajan or create any types of obstructions.

On 1st February, 1986, a Muslim from Ayodhya filed a suit in the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court against the opening of the locks. The Sunni Waqf also filed a suit for the same purpose.

During January 1989, the 3rd Dharma Sansad met at the Mahakhumba in Prayag, and decided to perform Shilanyas on 9th November, 1989.

On 1st July, 1989, Retired Justice of the High Court, Shri Deoki Nandan Agarwala, joined the suit as a friend of the court on behalf of Rama Lala and the Janmabhoomi.

On 18th October, 1989 the Sunni Waqf Board filed a suit for not allowing any people to the Janmabhoomi area and not to allow any Shilanyas within 200 yards from the site. On 23rd October, 1989 the Full Bench rejected the Waqf Board’s request.

Muslim parties continued their effort of stopping the Shilanyas by filing two more suits petitions in the Supreme Court. On 27th October, 1989 the Supreme Court dismissed both cases and the path for Shilanyas was cleared.

On 10th October, 1991, the then U.P. government acquired the 2.77-acre of land, around the disputed Dacha, for the convenience of the devotees who attend the Ram Lalla Darshan, etc.

At this point the Muslim representatives filed a writ petition in the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court. On 25th October, 1991, the court after hearing all the parties issued an interim order stating that U.P. government has every right to do so. The High Court also said that they would issue a permanent decision by 4th November, 1992.

On 30th October, 1992 the fifth Dharma Sansad met in New Delhi and decided to start the Kara Save on 6th December, 1992.

On the morning of 8th December, 1992 the Central Government took over the complete Shri Rama Janmabhoomi Parisar area under its control. The pooja for Ram Lala did continue.

On 7th January, 1993 the Government of India, with the consent of the Parliament, took over some 67 acres of land all around the disputed area. But the Muslims took a tough stand stating that once a place becomes a Masjid, it does not matter what the new circumstances will become.

On 7th January, 1993, the President of India, per rule 143(1) of the Parliament, requested the Supreme Court for its opinion on the subject-matter and find out whether there existed a Hindu place of worship before the disputed Dhancha was constructed over it. The Supreme Court declined.

After 21 months of deliberations, on 24th October, 1994, the Supreme Court gave its majority decision in favour of the action taken by the Government under rule 4(3) and turned the case back to the Lucknow Bench of the High Court of U.P. Also it rejected the arguments of the Muslims that once a Masjid it always remains a Masjid. It further ordered that the pooja to Ram Lala can continue under the central dome and no action should be taken to change the situation. While turning down the claims of the Muslims the Supreme Court cited case under the Lahore High Court and the Privy Council.

As of now, the High Court continues to take depositions from the parties concerned (i.e., Sunny Waqf Board, and Nirmohi Akhada). Since 1966, on behalf of the Muslims, 16 out of some 103 depositions have been completed. On behalf of Hindus Paramhans Ramachandradasji has provided his deposition. On behalf of Hindus some 100 depositions have been completed. Annexure - 2

Bibliography

Advani, L.K. BJP Party Presidential Address, Bangalore, BJP Office, New Delhi 110001, 1993.

Advani, Lalkrishna, Ramjanmabhoomi (Hindi), Published by BJP Central Office.

Aggarwal, J.C. / Chowdhary, N.K. Ram Janmabhoomi through the Ages, S. Chand & Co. Ltd., 1991.

Anand, Shankar Pandya, ed., Ayodhya: An Answer to Terrorism and Fundamentalism, A.S. Pandya, Bombay, 400004.

Apte, B.P., R.S. Prasad et al., (ed.) Report of the Fact Finding Committee of Ayodhya", ABVP, Mumbai.

Asnani, G.C., "Appeal to Hindu Sadhus", sanatan Publishers, Houston USA, June 2000.

Ayodhya, Bombay Urban Industrial League, 1992.

Bajaj, Jitendra, Ayodhya and the future India, by Centre for Policy Studies, Madras, 1993.

Bajaj, Jitendra, Ayodhya and The Future of India, by Centre for Policy Studies, Madras, 1993.

Beveridge, Anettee, Babur Nama.

Bramar, Ramkumar, Pathik (Hindi) Radhakrishna Prakashan Private Ltd., New Delhi, 1993.

Chande, M.B., Shree Ram Janma Bhoomi, MBC Publisher, Nagpur, 1992.

Choudhuri R.D. (ed), Itihas Darpan, Bharatiya Ithihas Sankalan Yojana Samithi, Delhi, 1996.
Chouhan D.S., (ed), Vandemataram, Weekly (Hindi), Dharma Sansad Special Issue, Naati Imli Varanasi, Varanasi, March 1994.

Chouhan D.S., (ed), Vandemataram, Weekly (Hindi), Kasi Viswanath Special Issue, Naati Imli Varanasi, Varanasi, February 1995.

Dasgupta, Swapan / Joshi, M. Rama / Elst, Koneraad / Shourie, Arun, The Ayodhya Reference (Supreme Court Judgment & commentaries), Voice of India, 1995.

Dasgupta, Swapan / Jois, M. Rama, Jaitley Arun, The Ayodhya Reference (Supreme Court Judgement & commentaries), Voice of India, 1995.

Dictionary of Islam, "Islam", from Internet, 2001.

Dubashi Jay, The Road to Ayodhya, Voice of India, 1992.

Elst. Koenraad, Ayodhya & After, Voice of India, 1993.

Elst. Koenraad, Negativism in India, Concealing the Record of Islam, Voice of India, 1993.

Elst, Koenraad, Ram Janmabhoomi v/s Babri Masjid, Voice of India, 1990.

Encyclopedia of Britannica, "Islam", from Internet, 2001.

Father Kamil Bulke, Ramakatha (Hindi), Hindi Parishad, Prayag University, Allahabad, 1999.

Ghosh, A., The Koran and the Kafir (Islam and the Infidel), AG Publishers, Houston, USA, 1983.

Goel, Sita Ram, Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them, Vol. II, The Islamic Evidence", Voice of India, New Delhi, 2000

Gupta, S.P. "Rama Janmabhumi: Presidential Reference and Archeological Evidence: A Reappraisal", Ithihas Darpan, vol. II, New Delhi, 1995.

History Vs Casuistry, Voice of India, New Delhi, 1991.

Justice Deoki Nandan, Shri Rama Janma Bhumi: Historical and Legal Perspective, Sankat Mochan Ashram, New Delhi.

Justice Pandey, K.M. Voice of Conscience, Din Dayal Upadhyay Parkasham, Lucknow, 1996.

Khan, A.R. The Ayodhya Syndrome: The Intelligentsia’s Verdict, Kita Bhavan, New Delhi, 1999.

King, Fahd Ibn Adul Aziz Al- Saud, (by order) The Holy Quran, King Fahd Holy Quran Printing Complex, Ali-Madinah, 1410 AH.

Malkani, K.R., The Politics of Ayodhya and Hindu-Muslim Relations", Har-Anand Publications, New Delhi, 1993.

Mandal, D., (JNU) Ayodhya: Archaeology after Demolition, Orient Longman Ltd., New Delhi, 1993.

Mishra, Vinay Chandra, Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid (Historical documents legal opinions and judgements), Bar Council of India Trust, 1991.

Munshi, K.M. Somanatha: the shrine Eternal, Haratiya Vidhya Bhavan, Bombay, 1976.

Nath, R. Architecture of the Babri Masjid on Ayodhya, The Historical Research Documentation Programme, 1991.

Navaratna, S. Rajaram, The Politics of History: Aryan Invasion Theory and the Supervision of Scholarship, Voice of India, New Delhi, 1995.

Ramchandran, K.S., (Cr), "Ram Janmabhoomi and the Marxist Historians’, Historian Forum, New Delhi.

Sharma, Gopal, "Kar Sewa Se Kar Sewa Tak" (Hindi), Rajasthan Patrika Special Issue, Jaipur, Rajasthan, January 1993.

Sharma, Raghu Nandan P., Proceedings of the Eight Dharma Sansad Adhiveshan (Hindi), Sankat Mochan Ashram, New Delhi.

Sharma, Y.D. / Srivastava, K.M., Ramjanmabhoomi Ayodhya (New Archaeological Discoveries), Published by K.S. Lal, President of the Historian Forum.

Shourie, Arun, A Secular Agenda, ASA, 1993.

Shourie, Arun, Indian Controversies, ASA 1993.

Shourie, Arun, Narain Harsh, Dubashi Jay, Hindu temples what happened to them, Vol. 1 & 2, Voice of India, 1992.

Srivastava, Ramsharan, Eak Drushtikon Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid Vivad (Hindi), Carefree Printer, 1997.

Sinha, B.P., Sri Rama in Art, Archeology and Literature, The Bihar Purvid Parishad, Parna, 1989.

Verma T.P., & S.P. Gupta, Ayodhya Ka Ithihas Evam Puratatwa, (Hindi), Bharateeya Samskriti Parishad, New Delhi, 1993.

Vinay, C., Mishra and Prof. P. Singh, Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid: Historical Documents Legal Opinions and Judgements, The Bar Council of India Trust, Universal Book Traders, New Delhi, 1991.